Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 16, Issue 4, August 1996, Pages 245-255
Nurse Education Today

An investigation ofthe components used to calculate staff:student ratios in nursing and midwife education

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(96)80107-9Get rights and content

Abstract

This article describes the results of a census questionnaire sent to all colleges of nursing and midwifery and institutions of further and higher education undertaking English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (ENB) validated pre- and post-registration nursing and midwifery courses. The questionnaire was designed to identify the range of components, incorporated into formulae, used by the colleges and institutions to calculate staff:student ratios (SSRs), for each type of course. The results indicate that the majority of colleges and institutions use: SSR = Total number of staff/Total number of students The definitions of staff and student within the formulae were either assumed or variously defined. A total of 17 different formulae for calculating SSRs were identified and 10 different formulae for calculating whole time equivalents. Each of these formulae are given in the article. The advantages and disadvantages for resourcing nurse education arising from the lack of definition surrounding the standardisation of formulae and the components within formulae are discussed. The discussion reflects both the responses given in the open-ended questions in the questionnaire and the debates surrounding the use of SSRs highlighted in the literature.

References (17)

  • BaloghR. et al.

    Performance indicators in nurse education

  • BennerP. et al.

    The primacy of caring: stress and coping in health and illness

    (1989)
  • BillingD.

    Indicators of performance

  • BirchD.W. et al.

    Determining college establishments: Burnham v. the staff student ratio

    Journal of Further and Higher Education

    (1980)
  • CaveM. et al.

    The use ofperformance indicators in higher education

  • ClackG. et al.

    King's model for allocating service increment for teaching and research (SIFTR)

    British Medical Journal

    (1992)
  • EllisR.

    Getting the ratio right

    Nursing Times

    (1986)
  • ENB

    Regulations and guidelines for the approval of institutions and courses

    (1993)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text