Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 35, Issue 11, November 2015, Pages 1062-1068
Nurse Education Today

A constructivist theoretical proposition of cultural competence development in nursing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.05.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The development of cultural competence is a process of reflection and action.

  • We identified three dimensions of cultural competence evolving in three levels of development.

  • This process starts with a clinical immersion in a culturally diverse context.

  • This process is fostered by the interactions of students or nurses with their environment.

Summary

Cultural competence development in healthcare professions is considered an essential condition to promote quality and equity in healthcare. Even if cultural competence has been recognized as continuous, evolutionary, dynamic, and developmental by most researchers, current models of cultural competence fail to present developmental levels of this competence. These models have also been criticized for their essentialist perspective of culture and their limited application to competency-based approach programs. To our knowledge, there have been no published studies, from a constructivist perspective, of the processes involved in the development of cultural competence among nurses and undergraduate student nurses. The purpose of this study was to develop a theoretical proposition of cultural competence development in nursing from a constructivist perspective.

We used a grounded theory design to study cultural competence development among nurses and student nurses in a healthcare center located in a culturally diverse urban area. Data collection involved participant observation and semi-structured interviews with 24 participants (13 nurses and 11 students) working in three community health settings.

The core category, ‘learning to bring the different realities together to provide effective care in a culturally diverse context’, was constructed using inductive qualitative data analysis. This core category encompasses three dimensions of cultural competence: ‘building a relationship with the other’, ‘working outside the usual practice framework’, and ‘reinventing practice in action.’ The resulting model describes the concurrent evolution of these three dimensions at three different levels of cultural competence development. This study reveals that clinical experience and interactions between students or nurses and their environment both contribute significantly to cultural competence development. The resulting theoretical proposition of cultural competence development could be used not only to guide initial and continuing nursing education, but also to help redefine quality of care in a culturally diverse context.

Introduction

The development of cultural competence among healthcare professionals and students is considered one of a series of solutions to improve quality of care in a culturally diverse context and to reduce health inequities (Calvillo et al., 2009). Many studies have explored cultural competence and its inclusion in nursing education programs. The vast majority of these studies are based on Leininger's conceptions of culture and culturally congruent care (Leininger and McFarland, 2006). Studies have also presented teaching strategies that foster the development of this competence and their effects on student learning (Kokko, 2011, Long, 2012). Most of these strategies are based on acquiring specific knowledge about given cultural groups, which denotes an essentialist understanding of the concept of culture and leaves little room for diversity within any one culture (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015). From a constructivist perspective, the concept of culture is considered to be fluid, dynamic, and constantly evolving in relation to historical, political, and social conditions. In this sense, culture is a relational process. A culturally diverse context thus encompasses diversity that can assume many forms in society—such as age, gender, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status—and is not limited to race and ethnicity. Moreover, even the notion of competence itself becomes problematic when it refers to know-how or behaviors to be adopted. Competence, understood from a constructivist perspective, refers rather to a systemic and holistic conception of learning (Tardif, 2006). Developing a competence involves challenging one's prior knowledge and developing new knowledge in a dialectic manner through an iterative cycling of reflection and action (Duke et al., 2009). Hence, the development of a competence requires long-term work and continues throughout life.

Even if cultural competence has been recognized as continuous, evolutionary, dynamic, and developmental by most researchers (e.g. Andrews and Boyle, 2012, Campinha-Bacote, 2002, Jeffreys, 2010, Giger and Davidhizar, 2008, Papadopoulos, 2006, Purnell and Paulanka, 2003), current models of cultural competence fail to present developmental levels of this competence. Most models focus on cultural competence domains such as cultural sensitivity, awareness, skill, knowledge, and encounter (Shen, 2014) without presenting the learning processes involved in the concurrent evolution of these domains. Hence, they do not depict a profile of the progression of this competence that could be used in a competency-based approach to education. Thus, it becomes difficult to assess a progression in the development of this competence among students and nurses from another point of view than the one of the learner. Most models have also been criticized for their focus on ethnicity, on popular and stereotypical representations of cultural groups, and on cultural differences (Williamson and Harrison, 2010). Williamson and Harrison (2010) point out that emphasizing differences can reinforce ethnocentric approaches to care. Even though authors have recognized the systemic nature of cultural competence, models still focus on individual actions, thereby obscuring the influence of organizational and societal structures.

Some recent studies have described the relation of cultural competence with the environment at a personal, organizational and global level (Soulé, 2014). However, these studies have not moved from a descriptive perspective to the integration of the resulting categories or concepts described into a unified theoretical proposition.

Drawing from both the nursing (Calvillo et al., 2009, Duke et al., 2009, Goudreau et al., 2009, Lynam et al., 2007) and the education sciences literature (National Research Council, 2001, Tardif, 2006), Blanchet Garneau and Pepin (2015) have defined cultural competence as a “complex know-act3 grounded in critical reflection and action, which the healthcare professional draws upon to provide culturally safe, congruent, and effective care in partnership with individuals, families, and communities living health experiences, and which takes into account the social and political dimensions of care”. This definition highlights the interactional, dialogical, dynamic, contextual and evolutionary nature of cultural competence. The development of cultural competence is then understood as a lifelong ongoing process.

While there is an abundance of literature on cultural competence and its domains in various health fields, there is little data on the learning processes involved in the development of this competence from a constructivist perspective. The aim of this study was to develop a constructivist theoretical proposition of the development of cultural competence in nursing. We wanted to answer the following research question: how do nurses develop their cultural competence in their learning and practicing environments?

Section snippets

Methods

Methodologically, this research was informed by the constructivist perspective described by Guba and Lincoln (2005), who proposed a relativist ontology and a subjectivist and transactional epistemology. A constructivist perspective provides a theoretical lens to consider the development of cultural competence as a process that situates actors engaged in learning in constant interaction with their environment. We used Corbin and Strauss' (2008) grounded theory to document the process of cultural

Results

Based on in-depth analysis of the data, we formulated a theoretical proposition for cultural competence development. This proposition is summarized in Fig. 1 and comprises four key components:

  • 1.

    The development of cultural competence is a process of reflection and action that consists of learning to bring the different realities together to provide effective care in a culturally diverse context.

  • 2.

    This process involves developing the three dimensions of cultural competence: building a relationship

Discussion

This theoretical proposition is distinctive largely because it adopts a constructivist perspective of culture, competence, and cultural competence. It is also grounded in empirical data and defines interrelated phases of development that involve combining different types of knowledge. It highlights interactions between the nurses or students and their learning environment from the earliest stages of learning through to an expert level. The results of this study are in line with those of other

Conclusion

This study will help advance nursing knowledge by furthering the understanding of how nurses and students develop cultural competence. The use of this theoretical proposition for cultural competence development has the potential to take nurses beyond the established structures of their practice to provide effective and good-quality services in a culturally diverse context. It could also be used to identify effective cultural competence development strategies that could be incorporated into

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC 767-2010-1287), the Ministère de l'Éducation du Loisir et du Sport of Quebec (MELS 195 975 475), and the team FUTUR funded by the Quebec Research Foundation, Society and Culture (FRQSC 171378).

References (30)

  • E. Guerrero

    Organizational characteristics that foster early adoption of cultural and linguistic competence in outpatient substance abuse treatment in the United States

    Eval. Program Plann.

    (2012)
  • M. Williamson et al.

    Providing culturally appropriate care: a literature review

    Int. J. Nurs. Stud.

    (2010)
  • M.M. Andrews et al.

    Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care

    (2012)
  • A. Blanchet Garneau

    Constructivist Theoretical Proposition for the Development of Cultural Competence in Nursing [French]

    (2013)
  • A. Blanchet Garneau et al.

    Cultural competence: a constructivist definition

    J. Transcult. Nurs.

    (2015)
  • E. Calvillo et al.

    Cultural competency in baccalaureate nursing education

    J. Transcult. Nurs.

    (2009)
  • J. Campinha-Bacote

    The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: a model of care

    J. Transcult. Nurs.

    (2002)
  • J. Corbin et al.

    Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

    (2008)
  • J. Duke et al.

    Becoming a culturally competent health practitioner in the delivery of culturally safe care: a process oriented approach

    J. Cult. Divers.

    (2009)
  • J.N. Giger et al.

    Transcultural Nursing: Assessment and Intervention

    (2008)
  • J. Goudreau et al.

    A second generation of the competency-based approach to nursing education

    Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh.

    (2009)
  • E.G. Guba et al.

    Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences

  • M.R. Jeffreys

    Teaching Cultural Competence in Nursing and Health Care: Inquiry, Action, and Innovation

    (2010)
  • R. Kokko

    Future nurses' cultural competencies: what are their learning experiences during exchange and studies abroad? A systematic literature review

    J. Nurs. Manag.

    (2011)
  • M. Leininger et al.

    Transcultural Nursing: Concepts, Theories, and Practice

    (2006)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Translation to practice of cultural safety education in nursing and midwifery: A realist review

      2022, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      In evaluating cultural competency programs an issue has been reliance on student self-perception risking responses influenced by social desirability (Jongen et al., 2018; Truong et al., 2014) and self celebration. Acknowledging this, evaluation predominantly shows that cultural competency education programs increase cultural awareness but do not measure behaviour change (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015; Gallagher and Polanin, 2015). In contrast to cultural competency, cultural safety was conceptualised in New Zealand, 1992, in response to health disparities for Maori peoples (Papps and Ramsden, 1996).

    • Intercultural readiness of nursing students: An integrative review of evidence examining cultural competence educational interventions

      2021, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Demographic questionnaires (Mesler, 2014; Noble et al., 2014; Govere et al., 2016) and surveys (Allen et al., 2013; Noble et al., 2014; Flood and Commendador, 2016) were used. Two out of five qualitative studies used qualitative descriptive designs (Henderson et al., 2016; Chan et al., 2017), while other studies used; qualitative content analysis (Chan and Nyback, 2015), qualitative interpretive design (Carlson et al., 2017) and grounded theory (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015). Data collection methods used included: reflective journals (Chan and Nyback, 2015; Carlson et al., 2017; Chan et al., 2017), group interviews/focus groups, (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015; Henderson et al., 2016; Carlson et al., 2017; Chan et al., 2017), Skype-based debriefing sessions (Chan et al., 2017), transcribed written-oral presentations and assignments (Chan and Nyback, 2015) and observation (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: + 1 514 343 6111 #38526.

    2

    Tel.: + 1 514 343 7619.

    View full text