A constructivist theoretical proposition of cultural competence development in nursing
Introduction
The development of cultural competence among healthcare professionals and students is considered one of a series of solutions to improve quality of care in a culturally diverse context and to reduce health inequities (Calvillo et al., 2009). Many studies have explored cultural competence and its inclusion in nursing education programs. The vast majority of these studies are based on Leininger's conceptions of culture and culturally congruent care (Leininger and McFarland, 2006). Studies have also presented teaching strategies that foster the development of this competence and their effects on student learning (Kokko, 2011, Long, 2012). Most of these strategies are based on acquiring specific knowledge about given cultural groups, which denotes an essentialist understanding of the concept of culture and leaves little room for diversity within any one culture (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015). From a constructivist perspective, the concept of culture is considered to be fluid, dynamic, and constantly evolving in relation to historical, political, and social conditions. In this sense, culture is a relational process. A culturally diverse context thus encompasses diversity that can assume many forms in society—such as age, gender, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status—and is not limited to race and ethnicity. Moreover, even the notion of competence itself becomes problematic when it refers to know-how or behaviors to be adopted. Competence, understood from a constructivist perspective, refers rather to a systemic and holistic conception of learning (Tardif, 2006). Developing a competence involves challenging one's prior knowledge and developing new knowledge in a dialectic manner through an iterative cycling of reflection and action (Duke et al., 2009). Hence, the development of a competence requires long-term work and continues throughout life.
Even if cultural competence has been recognized as continuous, evolutionary, dynamic, and developmental by most researchers (e.g. Andrews and Boyle, 2012, Campinha-Bacote, 2002, Jeffreys, 2010, Giger and Davidhizar, 2008, Papadopoulos, 2006, Purnell and Paulanka, 2003), current models of cultural competence fail to present developmental levels of this competence. Most models focus on cultural competence domains such as cultural sensitivity, awareness, skill, knowledge, and encounter (Shen, 2014) without presenting the learning processes involved in the concurrent evolution of these domains. Hence, they do not depict a profile of the progression of this competence that could be used in a competency-based approach to education. Thus, it becomes difficult to assess a progression in the development of this competence among students and nurses from another point of view than the one of the learner. Most models have also been criticized for their focus on ethnicity, on popular and stereotypical representations of cultural groups, and on cultural differences (Williamson and Harrison, 2010). Williamson and Harrison (2010) point out that emphasizing differences can reinforce ethnocentric approaches to care. Even though authors have recognized the systemic nature of cultural competence, models still focus on individual actions, thereby obscuring the influence of organizational and societal structures.
Some recent studies have described the relation of cultural competence with the environment at a personal, organizational and global level (Soulé, 2014). However, these studies have not moved from a descriptive perspective to the integration of the resulting categories or concepts described into a unified theoretical proposition.
Drawing from both the nursing (Calvillo et al., 2009, Duke et al., 2009, Goudreau et al., 2009, Lynam et al., 2007) and the education sciences literature (National Research Council, 2001, Tardif, 2006), Blanchet Garneau and Pepin (2015) have defined cultural competence as a “complex know-act3 grounded in critical reflection and action, which the healthcare professional draws upon to provide culturally safe, congruent, and effective care in partnership with individuals, families, and communities living health experiences, and which takes into account the social and political dimensions of care”. This definition highlights the interactional, dialogical, dynamic, contextual and evolutionary nature of cultural competence. The development of cultural competence is then understood as a lifelong ongoing process.
While there is an abundance of literature on cultural competence and its domains in various health fields, there is little data on the learning processes involved in the development of this competence from a constructivist perspective. The aim of this study was to develop a constructivist theoretical proposition of the development of cultural competence in nursing. We wanted to answer the following research question: how do nurses develop their cultural competence in their learning and practicing environments?
Section snippets
Methods
Methodologically, this research was informed by the constructivist perspective described by Guba and Lincoln (2005), who proposed a relativist ontology and a subjectivist and transactional epistemology. A constructivist perspective provides a theoretical lens to consider the development of cultural competence as a process that situates actors engaged in learning in constant interaction with their environment. We used Corbin and Strauss' (2008) grounded theory to document the process of cultural
Results
Based on in-depth analysis of the data, we formulated a theoretical proposition for cultural competence development. This proposition is summarized in Fig. 1 and comprises four key components:
- 1.
The development of cultural competence is a process of reflection and action that consists of learning to bring the different realities together to provide effective care in a culturally diverse context.
- 2.
This process involves developing the three dimensions of cultural competence: building a relationship
Discussion
This theoretical proposition is distinctive largely because it adopts a constructivist perspective of culture, competence, and cultural competence. It is also grounded in empirical data and defines interrelated phases of development that involve combining different types of knowledge. It highlights interactions between the nurses or students and their learning environment from the earliest stages of learning through to an expert level. The results of this study are in line with those of other
Conclusion
This study will help advance nursing knowledge by furthering the understanding of how nurses and students develop cultural competence. The use of this theoretical proposition for cultural competence development has the potential to take nurses beyond the established structures of their practice to provide effective and good-quality services in a culturally diverse context. It could also be used to identify effective cultural competence development strategies that could be incorporated into
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC 767-2010-1287), the Ministère de l'Éducation du Loisir et du Sport of Quebec (MELS 195 975 475), and the team FUTUR funded by the Quebec Research Foundation, Society and Culture (FRQSC 171378).
References (30)
Organizational characteristics that foster early adoption of cultural and linguistic competence in outpatient substance abuse treatment in the United States
Eval. Program Plann.
(2012)- et al.
Providing culturally appropriate care: a literature review
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2010) - et al.
Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care
(2012) Constructivist Theoretical Proposition for the Development of Cultural Competence in Nursing [French]
(2013)- et al.
Cultural competence: a constructivist definition
J. Transcult. Nurs.
(2015) - et al.
Cultural competency in baccalaureate nursing education
J. Transcult. Nurs.
(2009) The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: a model of care
J. Transcult. Nurs.
(2002)- et al.
Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
(2008) - et al.
Becoming a culturally competent health practitioner in the delivery of culturally safe care: a process oriented approach
J. Cult. Divers.
(2009) - et al.
Transcultural Nursing: Assessment and Intervention
(2008)
A second generation of the competency-based approach to nursing education
Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh.
Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences
Teaching Cultural Competence in Nursing and Health Care: Inquiry, Action, and Innovation
Future nurses' cultural competencies: what are their learning experiences during exchange and studies abroad? A systematic literature review
J. Nurs. Manag.
Transcultural Nursing: Concepts, Theories, and Practice
Cited by (27)
Explaining the educational challenges in the path of cultural competence: The experiences of Iranian nursing students
2022, Journal of Professional NursingTranslation to practice of cultural safety education in nursing and midwifery: A realist review
2022, Nurse Education TodayCitation Excerpt :In evaluating cultural competency programs an issue has been reliance on student self-perception risking responses influenced by social desirability (Jongen et al., 2018; Truong et al., 2014) and self celebration. Acknowledging this, evaluation predominantly shows that cultural competency education programs increase cultural awareness but do not measure behaviour change (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015; Gallagher and Polanin, 2015). In contrast to cultural competency, cultural safety was conceptualised in New Zealand, 1992, in response to health disparities for Maori peoples (Papps and Ramsden, 1996).
A valid and reliable scale to assess cultural sensibility in nursing
2021, Nurse Education TodayIntercultural readiness of nursing students: An integrative review of evidence examining cultural competence educational interventions
2021, Nurse Education in PracticeCitation Excerpt :Demographic questionnaires (Mesler, 2014; Noble et al., 2014; Govere et al., 2016) and surveys (Allen et al., 2013; Noble et al., 2014; Flood and Commendador, 2016) were used. Two out of five qualitative studies used qualitative descriptive designs (Henderson et al., 2016; Chan et al., 2017), while other studies used; qualitative content analysis (Chan and Nyback, 2015), qualitative interpretive design (Carlson et al., 2017) and grounded theory (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015). Data collection methods used included: reflective journals (Chan and Nyback, 2015; Carlson et al., 2017; Chan et al., 2017), group interviews/focus groups, (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015; Henderson et al., 2016; Carlson et al., 2017; Chan et al., 2017), Skype-based debriefing sessions (Chan et al., 2017), transcribed written-oral presentations and assignments (Chan and Nyback, 2015) and observation (Blanchet Garneau and Pepin, 2015).
Evaluation of a nurse-led education program to improve cross-cultural care for older people in aged care
2020, Nurse Education TodayEducational interventions designed to develop nurses’ cultural competence: A systematic review
2019, International Journal of Nursing Studies