Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 102-106
Nurse Education Today

Developing a service user designed tool for the assessment of student mental health nurses in practice: A collaborative process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.04.005Get rights and content

Summary

In this article we describe and critically analyse the process of developing an assessment tool designed by users of mental health services to assess student nurses in practice. The developmental process raised a number of complex and unexpected issues. The findings suggest that rather than “assess” student nurses in practice, service users should have a role in reviewing student's practice. Whilst there was a consensus amongst stake-holders that engaging in this feedback process is beneficial to both the student and service user, it is the manner in which it is sought which requires further investigation.

Introduction

This article reports upon the development of a service user designed tool for the assessment of student mental health nurses in practice. This development was one phase of a larger nurse education participatory action research project (Service User Student Assessment (SUSA)) previously reported in Nurse Education Today (Stickley et al., 2010). This study aimed to assess the feasibility of integrating service user involvement into the practice assessment of mental health student nurses into the mainstream pre-registration curriculum. In the UK, courses consist of a “Common Foundation Programme”, where students study together to acquire the generic knowledge relevant to all fields of nursing. Students then move into their branch programme where they are able to choose to engage in the study of adult, child, learning disability or mental health nursing. Courses are usually at Diploma and Bachelor levels. The reported research study was conducted with mental health branch students in a Division of Nursing in England.

Academic researchers worked in collaboration with Making Waves, an organisation made up of people who have used mental health services. Making Waves have been established for approximately eight years and provide, service evaluation of mental health services, contribute to the development and evaluation of courses and provide research, education and training. They were commissioned to define the focus of an assessment tool that would be used by service users to assess student nurses in practice. This paper describes and critically analyses the process of developing and piloting the assessment tool during the implementation of the larger action research project.

The findings suggest that rather than “assess” student nurses in practice, service users should have a role in reviewing students' practice. A requirement to gain feedback on practice from service users to demonstrate students' clinical competence appeared to be a more advantageous model than the use of a structured and standardised assessment tool. Despite this, the process which informed the development of the tool offers a great deal of insight into the complexities of involving service users in the assessment of student nurses in practice and can offer useful guidance to others attempting to implement this kind of initiative. Whilst there is strong policy support for the involvement of service users in both practice and research in the United Kingdom (UK), there are few published reports of the findings of such initiatives.

Section snippets

Background

In recent years, service-user involvement in the health service has become a key component of Government policy in the UK, (Department of Health, 1990, Department of Health, 1991, Department of Health, 1992, Department of Health, 2001). This is supported nationally by the National Institute for Health Research through its INVOLVE (2010) initiative that seeks to promote public involvement in National Health Service, public health and social care research. Specifically, in nursing, the English

Conclusion

The process of developing a service user designed tool to aid the assessment of student nurses in practice has proved to be a complex task. The varied perceptions of all involved in the development and piloting of the tool resulted in a product which attempted to allow for individual experiences, wants and needs to be explored and expressed within diverse relationships and associated power differentials.

The number of complex issues which arose during the developmental phase however reflects the

Acknowledgements

This research was wholly funded by Burdett Trust for Nursing. The project was a collaboration between researchers from the University of Nottingham, employees of the Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust and members of Making Waves, Nottingham. Through their reflections on their own personal experiences of using mental health services, Making Waves provide service evaluation and contribute to the development of research, education and training. They can be contacted via their website: //www.makingwaves.org/

References (27)

  • Department of Health

    The Health of the Nation

    (1992)
  • Department of Health

    Involving patients and the public in healthcare: a discussion document

    (2001)
  • Department of Health

    From Values to Action Chief Nursing Officer's Review of Mental Health Nursing

    (2006)
  • Cited by (19)

    • The evaluation of nursing students by patients instrument (ENSPA): Development and validation

      2020, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such ceiling effect could result from the patient's fear to give negative feedback. Patients may fear to hurt the student's feelings or to have a negative impact on their future study trajectory (Stickley et al., 2011). One could argue that this renders scoring of patients less informative.

    • Service user involvement in giving mental health students feedback on placement: A participatory action research study

      2015, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Clynes and Raftery (2008) concurred that students’ self esteem and their age emerge as important variables affecting the way in which feedback is received. Findings from other research such as Stickley et al. (2011) and Masters and Forrest (2010) in the UK and Debyser et al. (2011) in Belgium stressed the importance of formative feedback which supports learning and, vicariously, assessment. These studies varied in the extent to which complexity and ambivalence were acknowledged in the findings.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text