Evidence for teaching practice: The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment

References 

1. American Association of Colleges in Nursing (AACN), 2008. Nursing Shortage Fact Sheet. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Media/FactSheets/NursingShortage.htm.
2. Banks D. Audience Response Systems in Higher Education. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Publishing; 2006;
3. Bruff, D., 2006. Research on the Effectiveness of Classroom Response Systems. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/cft/resources/teaching_resources/technology/crs.htm.
4. Bullock D, LaBella V, Clingan T, Ding Z, Stewart G, Thibado P. Enhancing student–instructor interaction frequency. The Physics Teacher. 2002;40:30–36
5. Burns N, Grove S. The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. sixth ed.. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2009;
6. Conoley J, Moore G, Croom B, Flowers J. A toy or a teaching tool? The use of audience–response systems in the classroom. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers. 2006;81(7):46–48
7. In:  Donovan M,  Bransford J,  Pellegrino J editor. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999;
8. Draper S, Brown M. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2004;20(2):81–94
9. Duncan D. Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems. New York: Addison-Wesley; 2005;
10. Fies, C., 2005. Classroom Response Systems: What do They Add to an Active Learning Environment? Doctoral Dissertation, Dissertation Abstracts International, vol. 66. University of Texas at Austin, p. 3195271.
11. Fies C, Marshall J. Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2006;15(1):101–109
12. Guthrie, R., Carlin, A., 2004. Waking the dead: using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY. http://www.mhhe.com/cps/docs/CPSWP_WakindDead082003.pdf.
13. Hall, R., Collier, H., Thomas, M., Hilgers, M., 2005. A student response system for increasing engagement, motivation, and learning in higher enrollment lectures. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE, USA. http://lite.mst.edu/documents/hall_et_al_srs_amcis_proceedings.pdf.
14. Herreid C. “Clicker” cases: introducing case study teaching into large classrooms. Journal of College Science Teaching. 2006;36(2):43–47
15. Knight J, Wood WB. Teaching more by teaching less. Cell Biology Education. 2005;4:298–310
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
16. Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Innovations in Family Medicine Education. 2005;37(1):12–14
17. Miller R, Ashar B, Getz K. Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2003;23:109–115
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Morling B, McAuliffe M, Cohen L, DiLorenzo T. Efficacy of personal response systems (“clickers”) in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology. 2008;35(1):45–50
19. Munro B. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. fifth ed.. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Wilkins and Williams; 2005;
20. Rhem, J., 2007. CLASSE: the missing link. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, vol. 16 (4). http://www.ntlf.com/html/ti/classe.htm.
21. Sawada, D., 2002. Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls. The Free Library. http://www.thefreelibrary.com./ Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in…-a091487242).
22. Schackow T, Chavez M, Loya L, Friedman M. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. Family medicine. 2004;36:496–504
    • MEDLINE
23. Skiba D. Got large lecture hall classes? Use clickers. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2006;27:278–280
    • MEDLINE
24. Stein P, Challman S, Brueckner J. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Nursing Education. 2006;45:469–473
25. Stowell J, Nelson J. Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology. 2007;34:253–258
26. Trapskin P, Smith K, Armstead J, Davis G. Use of an audience response system to introduce an anticoagulation guide to physicians, pharmacists, and pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2005;69:190–197
27. Uhari, M., Renko, M., Soini, H., 2003. Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Medical Education, vol. 3 (12). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/3/12.
28. Yourstone SA, Kraye HS, Albaum G. Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: do clickers improve learning?. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 2008;6(1):75–88
29. Zhu, E., 2007. How are faculty using clickers in the classroom? Center for Research on Teaching and Learning Occasional, Paper No. 22. http://www.crlt.umich.edu/publinks/CRLT_no22.pdf.