Nurse Education Today
Volume 30, Issue 7 , Pages 598-602, October 2010

Development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Organisational Culture Survey (CLOCS)

  • Amanda Henderson

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia
    • Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia. Tel.: +61 617 32402780.
  • ,
  • Debra Creedy

      Affiliations

    • Alice Lee Centre, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Rhonda Boorman

      Affiliations

    • Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
  • ,
  • Marie Cooke

      Affiliations

    • Griffith Health, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
  • ,
  • Rachel Walker

      Affiliations

    • Griffith Health, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia

Accepted 3 December 2009. published online 11 January 2010.

Summary 

Aim

This paper describes the development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Organisational Culture Survey (CLOCS) that measures prevailing beliefs and assumptions important for learning to occur in the workplace.

Method

Items from a tool that measured motivation in workplace learning were adapted to the nursing practice context. The tool was tested in the clinical setting, and then further modified to enhance face and content validity.

Participants

Registered nurses (329) across three major Australian health facilities were surveyed between June 2007 and September 2007.

Data analysis

An exploratory factor analysis identified five concepts – recognition, dissatisfaction, affiliation, accomplishment, and influence.

Validity and reliability

Internal consistency measures of reliability revealed that four concepts had good internal consistency: recognition (α=.914), dissatisfaction (α=.771), affiliation (α=.801), accomplishment (α=.664), but less so for influence (α=.529).

Results

This tool effectively measures recognition, affiliation and accomplishment – three concepts important for learning in practice situations, as well as dissatisfied staff across all these domains. Testing of additional influence items identify that this concept is difficult to delineate.

Conclusion

The CLOCS can effectively inform leaders about concepts inherent in the culture important for maximising learning by staff.

Keywords: Instrument development, Nurse education, Organisational development, Staff development

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0260-6917(09)00236-6

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.006

Nurse Education Today
Volume 30, Issue 7 , Pages 598-602, October 2010