Nurse Education Today
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 420-427, July 2010

The development of a ranking tool for refereed journals in which nursing and midwifery researchers publish their work

  • Patrick A. Crookes

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Wollongong, Australia
    • School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Centre for Health Initiatives, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 213174; fax: +61 2 4221 4718.
    • ,
  • Samantha L. Reis

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Initiatives, University of Wollongong, University of Wollongong, Australia
    • ,
  • Sandra C. Jones

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Initiatives, University of Wollongong, University of Wollongong, Australia
    • School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Australia

Accepted 24 September 2009. published online 11 November 2009.

Summary 

Publication in quality journals has long been a yardstick for measuring academic performance, although there is a divergence of opinions as to how to define and measure “journal quality”. For some time the primary tools for assessing journal quality have been the ISI Journal Citation Reports and the Journal Impact Factors (JIFs), although it has been argued that these are less appropriate for practical disciplines such as nursing midwifery. In order to accurately reflect the nature of nursing and midwifery as a discipline, given the inherent flaws of using just one indicator of journal quality to assess performance overall, this project was designed to develop a tool which combined both objective and subjective methods to produce a ranking system which is specifically relevant to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery. This project succeeded in developing the Journal Evaluation Tool (JET), through extensive consultations with experts in the fields of nursing and midwifery. This tool may overcome some problems associated with the sole use of the journal impact factor, and may be utilised as an alternative measure of journal quality. The new tool was tested using a sample of 52 responding journals; and has now been disseminated to nursing and midwifery bodies in Australia and New Zealand, along with instructions for its use and recommendations for future research.

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Research measurement, Research personnel, Information science

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0260-6917(09)00191-9

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.09.016

Nurse Education Today
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 420-427, July 2010

Article Tools