Nurse Education Today
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 405-410 , July 2010

The impact of clinical simulation on learner self-efficacy in pre-registration nursing education

  • Tamsin Pike

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley Campus, High Street, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 141 849 4281; fax: +44 141 849 4203.
  • ,
  • Victoria O’Donnell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Adult and Continuing Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 6NH, UK
    • Tel.: +44 141 330 1856.

,Accepted 24 September 2009.

References 

  1. Ammentorp J, Sabroe S, Kofoed P, Mainz J. The effect of training in communication skills on medical doctors’ and nurses’ self-efficacy. A randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counselling. 2007;66:270–277
  2. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1986;
  3. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997;
  4. Broussard L. Simulation-based learning: how simulators help nurses improved clinical skills and preserve patient safety. Nursing for Women’s Health. 2008;12(6):521–524
  5. Chant S, Jenkinson T, Randle J, Russell G. Communication skills: some problems in nursing education. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2002;11(1):12–21
  6. Chlan L, Halcon L, Kreitzer MJ, Leonard B. Influence of an experiential education session on nursing students’ confidence levels in performing selected complementary therapy skills. Complementary Health Practice Review. 2005;10(3):189–201
  7. Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. In:  Huberman AM,  Miles MB editor. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. London: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2002;p. 5–35
  8. Farrand P, McMullan M, Jowett R, Humphreys A. Implementing competency recommendations into pre-registration nursing curricula: effects upon levels of confidence in clinical skills. Nurse Education Today. 2006;26:97–103
  9. Flin, R., Glavin, R., Maran, N., Patey, R., 2003. Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) System Handbook, v1.0. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen. Available from: <http://www.abdn.ac.uk/iprc/documents/ants/ants_handbook_v1.0_electronic_access_version.pdf> (Accessed 15.07.09.).
  10. Goodman C, Evans C. Using focus groups. In:  Gerrish K,  Lacey A editor. The Research Process in Nursing. fifth ed.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006;p. 353–366
  11. Graham S, Weiner B. Theories and principles of motivation. In:  Berliner DC,  Calfee RC editor. Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: MacMillan Library Reference USA; 1996;p. 63–84
  12. Jarzemsky PA, McGrath J. Look before you leap: lessons learned when introducing clinical simulation. Nurse Educator. 2008;33(2):90–95
  13. Jeffries, P.R., Rizzolo, M.A., 2006. Summary Report: Designing and Implementing Models for the Innovative Use of Simulation to Teach Nursing Care of Ill Adults and Children: A National, Multi-Site, Multi-Method Study. National League for Nursing, New York. Available from: <http://www.nln.org/research/laerdalreport.pdf> (Accessed 09.07.09.).
  14. Lane C, Rollick S. The use of simulated patients and role-play in communication skills training: a review of the literature to August 2005. Patient Education and Counseling. 2007;67:13–20
  15. Lathlean J. Qualitative analysis. In:  Gerrish K,  Lacey A editor. The Research Process in Nursing. fifth ed.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006;p. 417–433
  16. Lauder W. Roxburgh, M., Holland, K., Johnson, M., Watson, R., Porter, M., Topping, K., Behr, A., 2008a. Nursing and Midwifery in Scotland: Being Fit for Practice. The Report of the Evaluation of Fitness for Practice Pre-Registration Nursing and Midwifery Curricula Project. NHS Education for Scotland, University of Dundee, Dundee. Available from: <http://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/practice_education/work/evaluation/documents/FFPFINALREPORTsept082.pdf> (Accessed 30.06.09.).
  17. Lauder W, Watson R, Topping K, Holland K, Johnson M, Porter M, et al. 2. An evaluation of fitness for practice curricula: self-efficacy, support and self-reported competence in pre-registration student nurses and midwives. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2008;17:1858–1867
  18. Lauder W, Holland K, Roxburgh M, Topping K, Watson R, Johnson M, et al. Measuring competence, self-reported competence and self-efficacy in pre-registration students. Nursing Standard. 2008;22(20):35–43
  19. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991;
  20. LeFlore JL, Anderson M, Michael JL, Engle W, Anderson J. Comparison of self-directed learning versus instructor-modelled learning during a simulated clinical experience. Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(3):170–177
  21. Leigh GT. High-fidelity patient simulation and nursing students’ self-efficacy: a review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2008;5(1):Article 37
  22. Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Background low- to high-fidelity simulation: a continuum of medical education. Medical Education. 2003;37(Suppl. 1):22–28
  23. McCaughan E, Parahoo K. Medical and surgical nurses’ perceptions of their levels of competence and educational needs in caring for patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2000;9:420–428
  24. Mitchell L, Flin R. Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;63(1):15–24
  25. Moule P, Wilford A, Sales R, Lockyer L. Student experiences and mentor views of the use of simulation for learning. Nurse Education Today. 2008;28:790–797
  26. Nursing and Midwifery Council . Standards of Proficiency for Pre-registration Nursing Education. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2004;
  27. Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2007a. Guidance for the Introduction of Essential Skills Clusters into Pre-Registration Nursing Education. Annexe 1 to NMC Circular 07/2007. NMC, London.
  28. Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2007b. Simulation and Practice Learning Project. Outcome of a Pilot Study to Test the Principles for Auditing Simulated Practice Learning Environments in the Pre-registration Nursing Programme. Available from: <http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=3703> (Accessed 16.04.08.).
  29. Office of Public Sector Information, 1998. Data Protection Act. Available from: <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/ukpga_19980029_en_1> (Accessed 10.07.09.).
  30. Pike, T., 2008. Confidence and Competence in Nursing Education. Unpublished MSc Dissertation. University of Glasgow.
  31. Reilly A, Spratt C. The perceptions of undergraduate student nurses of high-fidelity simulation based learning: a case report from the University of Tazmania. Nurse Education Today. 2007;27(6):542–550
  32. Roxburgh M, Watson R, Holland K, Johnson M, Lauder W, Topping K. A review of curriculum evaluation in United Kingdom Nursing Education. Nurse Education Today. 2008;28:881–889
  33. Sinclair B, Ferguson K. Integrated simulated teaching/learning strategies in undergraduate nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2009;6(1):Article 7
  34. Sleeper JA, Thompson C. The use of hi fidelity simulation to enhance nursing students’ therapeutic communication skills. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2008;5(1):Article 42
  35. Topping A. The quantitative–qualitative continuum. In:  Gerrish K,  Lacey A editor. The Research Process in Nursing. fifth ed.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006;p. 157–172
  36. UKCC . Fitness for Practice. Summary. London: UKCC; 1999;
  37. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery. 2006;139(2):140–149

PII: S0260-6917(09)00187-7

doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.09.013

Nurse Education Today
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 405-410 , July 2010