The supervision of professional doctorates: Experiences of the processes and ways forward

References 

1. Checkland P, Poulter J. Learning For Action. A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2006;
2. Checkland P, Scholes J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley and Sons; 1990;
3. Clarke C, Procter S. Practice development: ambiguity in research and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;30(4):975–982
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Cooksey, D., 2006. A review of UK health research funding. <http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/4/A/pbr06_cooksey_final_report_636.pdf> (accessed 28.05.03.).
5. Cowley S. Professional development and change in a learning organisation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995;21:965–974
   • MEDLINE
6. Edwards S. A professional practice-based doctorate: developing advanced nursing practice. Nurse Education Today. 2009;29:1–4
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (78 KB)
   • CrossRef
7. Ellis LB. Professional Doctorates for nurses: mapping provision and perceptions. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;50(4):440–448
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Evans B. Doctoral education in Australia. In:  Powell S,  Green H editor. The Doctorate Worldwide. McGraw Hill International; 2007;
9. Gatfield T. An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2005;27(3):311–325
10. Higher Education Funding Council for England . Improving Standards in Postgraduate Research Degree Programmes. London: HEFCE; 2003;
11. Holligan C. Fact and fiction: a case history of doctoral supervision. Educational Research. 2005;47(3):267–278
12. Leitch, S., 2006. Leith review of skills. Prosperity for all in the global economy – world class skills.
13. McKenna, H., 1997. The Mission, Substance and Doctoral Education in Nursing. International Network of Doctoral Education Conference. Vision and Strategy for International Doctoral Education. Vancouver, Canada, June 1997. <http://www.umich.edu/inden/papers/dnsc.html> (accessed 19.01.07.).
14. Neuman R. Policy and practice in doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education. 2007;32(4):459–473
15. Park C. New variant PhDL the changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2005;27(2):189–207
16. Park C. Redefining the Doctorate. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy; 2007;
17. Petersen EB. Negotiating academicity: postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education. 2007;32(4):475–487
18. RCUK, 2008. RCUK Delivery Plan 2008/09 to 2010/11. <http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/publications/2008deliveryplan.pdf> (accessed 28.05.08.).
19. Reed J, Procter S. Practitioner research in context. In:  Reed J,  Procter S editor. Practitioner Research in Health Care: The Insider Story. Chapman and Hall; 1995;p. 3–31
20. Roberts, G., 2002. SET for success. The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. The report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ review.
21. Sainsbury, 2007. <http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/Sainsbury-review051007.pdf>.
22. Thomson D, Kirkham S, Watson R, Stewart S. Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today. 2005;25:283–290
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (105 KB)
    • CrossRef
23. Warry, P., 2006. Increasing the economic impact of Research Councils. <http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file32802.pdf> (accessed 28.05.08.).
24. Winter R, Griffiths M, Green K. The ‘academic’ qualities of practice. What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD?. Studies in Higher Education. 2000;25(1):25–37