Nurse Education Today
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 544-548, July 2009

The assessment and development of drug calculation skills in nurse education – A critical debate

University of Greenwich, Avery Hill Road, Eltham, London SE9 2UG, United Kingdom

Accepted 26 August 2008. published online 26 March 2009.

Summary 

The drug calculation skill of nurses continues to be a national concern. The continued concern has led to the introduction of mandatory drug calculation skills tests which students must pass in order to go on to the nursing register. However, there is little evidence to demonstrate that nurses are poor at solving drug calculation in practice. This paper argues that nurse educationalists have inadvertently created a problem that arguably does not exist in practice through use of invalid written drug assessment tests and have introduced their own pedagogical practice of solving written drug calculations. This paper will draw on literature across mathematics, philosophy, psychology and nurse education to demonstrate why written drug assessments are invalid, why learning must take place predominantly in the clinical area and why the key focus on numeracy and formal mathematical skills as essential knowledge for nurses is potentially unnecessary.

Keywords: Drug calculations, Assessments, Clinical practice skills, Numeracy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0260-6917(08)00180-9

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.08.019

Nurse Education Today
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 544-548, July 2009